So reads the title of an an exceptional article in today’s (2/8/08) Wall Street Journal, written by Suzanne Sataline about the spate of resurgent anti-Mormonism and religious bigotry the Church and its members have experienced over the last year or so. Subtitled Mormons Dismayed by Harsh Spotlight, Ms. Sataline chronicles the recent uptake in anti-Mormon activity, particularly since the inception of the Mitt Romney Presidential bid. Update read the Church’s comments on Sataline and other related media articles:
Writes Sataline:
Mitt Romney’s campaign for the presidency brought more attention to the Mormon Church than it has had in years. What the church discovered was not heartening.
Critics of its doctrines and culture launched frequent public attacks. Polling data showed that far more Americans say they’d never vote for a Mormon than those who admitted they wouldn’t choose a woman or an African-American.
A Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll in late January revealed that 50% of Americans said they would have reservations or be “very uncomfortable” about a Mormon as president. That same poll found that 81% would be “enthusiastic” or “comfortable” with an African-American and 76% with a woman.
Of course, this comes as no surprise to members of the Church who have followed the Romney campaign and the media’s almost constant obsession with Mitt’s religion. The article also links to various blog quotations on a similar subject, entitled Blogging Mormonism. Sataline quotes Armand Moss equating the current anti-Mormonism with anti-Semitism, a chilling comparison:
“I don’t think that any of us had any idea how much anti-Mormon stuff was out there,” said Armand Mauss, a Mormon sociologist who has written extensively about church culture, in an interview last week. “The Romney campaign has given the church a wake-up call. There is the equivalent of anti-Semitism still out there.”
One of the most egregious examples noted was that of anti-Mormon bigot Lawrence O’Donnell Jr.:
Nevertheless, Mr. Romney’s campaign exposed a surprisingly virulent strain of anti-Mormonism that had been largely hidden to the general public.
In December, political pundit and actor Lawrence O’Donnell Jr. unleashed a tirade on the “McLaughlin Group” television talk show, tearing into the Mormon Church and Mr. Romney’s faith. “Romney comes from a religion founded by a criminal who was anti-American, pro-slavery, and a rapist. And he comes from that lineage and says, ‘I respect this religion fully.’…He’s got to answer.”
Mormons were outraged. Hundreds complained to the show and on radio talk shows and the Internet, protesting that the remarks about church founder Joseph Smith were bigoted and unfounded.
Mr. O’Donnell, a former MSNBC commentator who plays a lawyer for polygamists on the HBO drama “Big Love,” says he has nothing to apologize for. “Everything I said was true,” he says. Although the McLaughlin Group says it will keep Mr. O’Donnell off the air for now, neither MSNBC nor HBO plans to take action against him, spokespeople say.
So, Mr. O’Donnell, plays a lawyer on a cable show noted for it’s own anti-Mormon bent, and that somehow makes him an authority on everything Mormon. Apparently, though O’Donnell’s comments infuriated Mormons all over the United States, and they let Mr. O’Donnell and others know about it:
For Mormons, Mr. O’Donnell’s comments were a rallying cry. Members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are taught not to argue with outsiders over faith. But as criticism of their church rose to new heights during the campaign, they took on their antagonists like never before, in a wave of activism encouraged by church leadership.
Mormon leaders and church members say they were initially unprepared for the intensity of attacks, which many say were unprecedented in modern times. The attacks, they say, are a sign that their long struggle for wide acceptance in America is far from over, despite global church expansion and prosperity . . .
Mormons called on the “McLaughlin Group” to take action against Mr. O’Donnell. Host John McLaughlin decided that Mr. O’Donnell, who appeared seven times last year, will be kept off the air for now, says Allison Butler, the show’s managing director. Any apology to Mormons must come from him, Ms. Butler says.
Although Mr. Romney’s withdrawal from the race is likely to quiet the controversy for now, many church members believe the turmoil of the past year will have lasting effects.
“There will be a long-term consequence in the Mormon church,” says Mr. Mauss, the Mormon sociologist. “I think there is going to be a wholesale reconsideration with how Mormons should deal with the latent and overt anti-Mormon propaganda. I don’t think the Mormons are ever again going to sorrowfully turn away and close the door and just keep out of the fray.”
Then, of course there was the sophomoric mocking and ridicule of beliefs imputed to Mormons, by some of our evangelical brethren:
Mr. Romney’s candidacy revived old lines of attack and mockery of some of the church’s unusual practices, such as secret ceremonies, the wearing of special undergarments, and the baptizing the dead in the belief that it will help them join family members in heaven.
Among the most active critics were practitioners of evangelical Christian “apologetics” — speakers and writers who make their mission to actively defend their faith. For some of them, that involves criticizing Mormonism.
At the Life Point Bible Church in Quincy, Ill., last month, evangelical apologist Rocky Hulse told 35 members that Mr. Romney should not be considered a Christian. Mr. Hulse, a former Mormon, told the group that Mormons believe in more than one god and that they believe God impregnated Mary in the normal fashion, not by granting her a virgin birth. The audience sat rapt.
We all remember Rocky Hulse, running the modern day equivalent of the Nauvoo Expositor. Rocky is one of those bigots, who once was Mormon, saw the light, left the Church, but just couldn’t leave it alone. Now he makes his living by lying about and denigrating the sacred religious beliefs of others. Under the heading “too much time on his hands” sits the picture of Rocky and his gang.
Interestingly, the bigotry was not limited only to the ilk of Rocky Hulse. Not to be out done, Mike Huckabee with his aw shucks ma’am demeanor innocently posited the question about whether Mormons believe Jesus and Satan are brothers:
In December, while campaigning for the Iowa caucuses, former Baptist preacher and Republican candidate Mike Huckabee asked a magazine reporter: “Don’t Mormons believe that Jesus and the devil are brothers?” The Southern Baptist Convention, Mr. Huckabee’s denomination, posts essays on its Web site saying Mormonism is a non-Christian cult.
Mormon church leaders, who repeatedly asserted the church’s neutrality in elections, had tried to keep out of the political fray. Church spokesman Michael Otterson says they couldn’t ignore Mr. Huckabee’s comment. Members said it implied that they were devil worshipers. Phones were ringing off the hook at church headquarters in Salt Lake City.
“Jesus Christ and Lucifer are indeed offspring of our Heavenly Father and, therefore, spirit brothers” from a pre-existing world, the church said in a statement. “Christ was the only begotten in the flesh.”
“I’m not impugning the motives of a political candidate,” Mr. Otterson said. “But the result of the question was to confuse the situation, not to enlighten.” Mr. Huckabee swiftly apologized to Mr. Romney for the comment. He handily won the Iowa caucuses, helped by huge numbers of evangelicals.
Of course, knowing Huckabee’s immersion in the Southern Baptist religious culture no one can seriously believe Huckabee’s defense of injecting that bit of bigotry into the Presidential election cycle.
Overall I liked the article’s content and tone. It points out what has been obvious from the most recent media scrutiny of the Church, and Mitt Romney since beginning his campaign. I was not a Romney supporter. But, I think he got the raw end of the media obsession with his religion and his beliefs. No other candidate was scrutinized through a religious lens as was Mitt Romney. While I don’t think Romney lost the nomination because of the Mormon issue, it was like an albatross around his neck, one certainly not hindering any other republican candidate seeking the GOP’s nomination this year.
In a related story, see Peggy Fletcher Stack’s story here in the Salt Lake Tribune, and Article VI’s commentary here.
For other bloggernacle treatment of this article, see also DMI Dave’s post: Romney Looking Back, and Molly Bennion’s post over at BCC.
__________________________________________________________________
TABERNACLE ON TRIAL
Mormons Dismayed by Harsh Spotlight
February 8, 2008; Page A1
Mitt Romney’s campaign for the presidency brought more attention to the Mormon Church than it has had in years. What the church discovered was not heartening.
Critics of its doctrines and culture launched frequent public attacks. Polling data showed that far more Americans say they’d never vote for a Mormon than those who admitted they wouldn’t choose a woman or an African-American.
A Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll in late January revealed that 50% of Americans said they would have reservations or be “very uncomfortable” about a Mormon as president. That same poll found that 81% would be “enthusiastic” or “comfortable” with an African-American and 76% with a woman.
The Mormon religion “was the silent factor in a lot of the decision making by evangelicals and others,” says Democratic pollster Peter Hart, who conducted the poll. The Romney campaign ran into “a religious bias head wind,” Mr. Hart and his Republican polling partner, Bill McInurff, wrote late last month.
“I don’t think that any of us had any idea how much anti-Mormon stuff was out there,” said Armand Mauss, a Mormon sociologist who has written extensively about church culture, in an interview last week. “The Romney campaign has given the church a wake-up call. There is the equivalent of anti-Semitism still out there.”
Yesterday, the former Massachusetts governor said he was suspending his quest for the Republican nomination, following a poor showing in the “Super Tuesday” contests. Mr. Romney made no mention of his religion when he withdrew.
There were many other factors that may have contributed to his failed campaign. He didn’t gain sufficient traction among the social conservatives influential to his party. Opponents attacked him, saying he changed his moderate stances to more conservative ones to attract votes, including his position on abortion.
Some observers play down religious bias as a factor. Ken Jennings, a Mormon who was a “Jeopardy!” champion, says anti-Mormon attacks “contributed” to Mr. Romney’s problems, but weren’t the only obstacle. “I suspect there were bigger forces in play than the religion,” such as perceptions that Mr. Romney had shifted his positions, says Mr. Jennings, of Seattle. “There were principled reasons to say, ‘I like McCain over Romney.'”
Religion “wasn’t a factor in the governor’s decision to step aside,” says Eric Fehrnstrom, a campaign spokesman. “There was a lot more focus on religion early on in the race, but as people learned more about Gov. Romney, his success as a businessman and as leader of the Olympics, it receded as an issue into the background.”
Anti-Mormonism
Nevertheless, Mr. Romney’s campaign exposed a surprisingly virulent strain of anti-Mormonism that had been largely hidden to the general public.
In December, political pundit and actor Lawrence O’Donnell Jr. unleashed a tirade on the “McLaughlin Group” television talk show, tearing into the Mormon Church and Mr. Romney’s faith. “Romney comes from a religion founded by a criminal who was anti-American, pro-slavery, and a rapist. And he comes from that lineage and says, ‘I respect this religion fully.’…He’s got to answer.”
Mormons were outraged. Hundreds complained to the show and on radio talk shows and the Internet, protesting that the remarks about church founder Joseph Smith were bigoted and unfounded.
Mr. O’Donnell, a former MSNBC commentator who plays a lawyer for polygamists on the HBO drama “Big Love,” says he has nothing to apologize for. “Everything I said was true,” he says. Although the McLaughlin Group says it will keep Mr. O’Donnell off the air for now, neither MSNBC nor HBO plans to take action against him, spokespeople say.
“The vast majority of Americans recognize that one of our strengths as a nation is our tolerance for religions that are different than our own,” says Mr. Fehrnstrom, the campaign spokesman. “Sadly, not every person thinks that way, but there’s nothing that can be said or done to change their small minds.”
For Mormons, Mr. O’Donnell’s comments were a rallying cry. Members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are taught not to argue with outsiders over faith. But as criticism of their church rose to new heights during the campaign, they took on their antagonists like never before, in a wave of activism encouraged by church leadership.
Mormon leaders and church members say they were initially unprepared for the intensity of attacks, which many say were unprecedented in modern times. The attacks, they say, are a sign that their long struggle for wide acceptance in America is far from over, despite global church expansion and prosperity.
On the Internet, the Romney bid prompted an outpouring of broadsides against Mormonism from both the secular and religious worlds. Evangelical Christian speakers who consider it their mission to criticize Mormon beliefs lectured to church congregations across the country. Richard John Neuhaus, editor of the Catholic journal First Things, wrote that a Mormon presidency would threaten Christian faiths. Atheist author Christopher Hitchens called Mormonism “a mad cult” on Slate.com, and Bill Keller, a former convict who runs an online ministry in Florida, told a national radio audience that a vote for Mr. Romney was a vote for Satan.
“It seems like it’s been open season on Mormons,” says Marvin Perkins, a Los Angeles Mormon Church member who lectures about the history of blacks in the church.
Mr. Romney was reluctant to speak publicly about his religion. Eventually, senior advisers persuaded him to do so to allay voter concerns about how it might affect his decision-making as president. Comparisons were made to a campaign speech that John Kennedy, who became America’s first Roman Catholic president, delivered to an audience of Baptists. Although Mr. Romney’s December speech was well-received by political pundits, it did little to move his polling numbers.
That same month, M. Russell Ballard, one of the church’s 12 apostles, or governors, urged students at a graduation at Church-owned Brigham Young University to use the Internet and “new media” to defend the faith. At least 150 new Mormon sites were created and registered with the site mormon-blogs.com. “People were haranguing us on the Internet,” Mr. Ballard said in an interview. “I just felt we needed to unleash our own people.”
Normally insular church leaders, with help from Washington-based consultant Apco Worldwide, began a public-relations campaign last fall, visiting 11 editorial boards of newspapers across the country. In another first, the church posted a series of videos, some featuring Mr. Ballard, on YouTube to counter a wave of anti-Mormon footage on the site.
‘Member of the Tribe’
Many Mormons were excited by Mr. Romney’s candidacy. “There’s a member of the tribe that’s up there,” Nathan Oman, an assistant professor at William and Mary School of Law, said last month, adding that he had not yet decided whom to vote for. “What happens to him is a test of whether or not our tribe gets included in the political universe.”
Mormonism began in 1830 after Joseph Smith, a farmer in upstate New York, said an angel led him to some golden plates that contained a “New World gospel” — the Book of Mormon. Mormons regard themselves as Christians, but some Christian denominations, including the Southern Baptist Convention, do not. They regard as heresy the Mormon belief that Mr. Smith was a prophet and that the Bible was not the final word of God.
The faith’s early history was marked by tension and brutal forced exiles, sparked in part by the practice of polygamy by some church members. After Mr. Smith was arrested in Nauvoo, Ill., a mob killed him and drove off his followers. The Mormons fled to Utah. Polygamy fed repeated conflicts with the federal government until the church banned the practice world-wide in 1904. The church has flourished in recent years, and claims 13 million members world-wide.
Old Lines of Attack
Mr. Romney’s candidacy revived old lines of attack and mockery of some of the church’s unusual practices, such as secret ceremonies, the wearing of special undergarments, and the baptizing the dead in the belief that it will help them join family members in heaven.
Among the most active critics were practitioners of evangelical Christian “apologetics” — speakers and writers who make their mission to actively defend their faith. For some of them, that involves criticizing Mormonism.
At the Life Point Bible Church in Quincy, Ill., last month, evangelical apologist Rocky Hulse told 35 members that Mr. Romney should not be considered a Christian. Mr. Hulse, a former Mormon, told the group that Mormons believe in more than one god and that they believe God impregnated Mary in the normal fashion, not by granting her a virgin birth. The audience sat rapt.
Scott Gordon, president of the Foundation for Apologetic Information & Research, a Mormon group, says Mr. Hulse is wrong on the facts. Mormons pray to one God, he says, and believe, like most Christians, that Mary was a virgin. Mr. Gordon went on talk-radio shows to rebut claims of other apologists.
In December, while campaigning for the Iowa caucuses, former Baptist preacher and Republican candidate Mike Huckabee asked a magazine reporter: “Don’t Mormons believe that Jesus and the devil are brothers?” The Southern Baptist Convention, Mr. Huckabee’s denomination, posts essays on its Web site saying Mormonism is a non-Christian cult.
Mormon church leaders, who repeatedly asserted the church’s neutrality in elections, had tried to keep out of the political fray. Church spokesman Michael Otterson says they couldn’t ignore Mr. Huckabee’s comment. Members said it implied that they were devil worshipers. Phones were ringing off the hook at church headquarters in Salt Lake City.
“Jesus Christ and Lucifer are indeed offspring of our Heavenly Father and, therefore, spirit brothers” from a pre-existing world, the church said in a statement. “Christ was the only begotten in the flesh.”
“I’m not impugning the motives of a political candidate,” Mr. Otterson said. “But the result of the question was to confuse the situation, not to enlighten.” Mr. Huckabee swiftly apologized to Mr. Romney for the comment. He handily won the Iowa caucuses, helped by huge numbers of evangelicals.
(Mr. Huckabee himself may face voter opposition for his religious views. The January Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll showed that 45% of Americans have concerns about an evangelical Christian as president.)
Soon, the Mormon Church began posting its videos on YouTube — 22 so far. One clip, for example, showed Mr. Ballard, the church apostle, answering the question “Are Mormons Christian?” It has drawn 26,000 views. By contrast, a cartoon clip from “The God Makers,” a 1980s film that mocks Mormon beliefs, has been viewed 945,000 times.
Mr. Ballard’s call for more new-media activism inspired dozens of new Web sites. On Politicalds.com, several Mormons of different political views write about the presidential race. Founder Mike Rogan, of Chandler, Ariz., says he started the blog “to combat some specific misconceptions about Mormons,” including that all Mormons are “conservatives with a mindless ‘sheep’ mentality.”
Mr. Hitchens, the best-selling author of “God is Not Great,” wrote last fall that Mr. Romney owed voters a discussion about “the mad cult” of his church. Similar commentaries inspired Ryan Bell, a Salt Lake City attorney, to start a Web site, Romney Experience.com last summer. “Every faith has wacky doctrines,” he says, adding that the press seems fixated on his faith’s more sensational side.
Mormon fury boiled over after Mr. O’Donnell’s appearance on the “McLaughlin Group,” when he called Mr. Smith a proslavery criminal and rapist. He said Mr. Romney “was” a racist because he was a member of a church that discriminated against blacks until 1978.
Mr. Bell and others responded on their Web sites that church founder Mr. Smith, who faced many charges in his turbulent life, including treason, was never convicted of any crimes. (At least one Mormon historian says he was found guilty of a misdemeanor as a minor for fraud, but others say incomplete court records make it impossible to determine.)
The allegations about blacks stung the most. Many Mormon historians say Mr. Smith welcomed blacks from the church’s inception, had ordained some blacks, and ran on an abolitionist platform for president in 1844. Blacks were barred from being church leaders, they say, by his successor, Brigham Young. Many Protestant churches, Mr. Bell pointed out, were segregated well into the 20th century. In 1978, the church lifted the ban on blacks becoming leaders.
Taking Action
Mormons called on the “McLaughlin Group” to take action against Mr. O’Donnell. Host John McLaughlin decided that Mr. O’Donnell, who appeared seven times last year, will be kept off the air for now, says Allison Butler, the show’s managing director. Any apology to Mormons must come from him, Ms. Butler says.
Although Mr. Romney’s withdrawal from the race is likely to quiet the controversy for now, many church members believe the turmoil of the past year will have lasting effects.
“There will be a long-term consequence in the Mormon church,” says Mr. Mauss, the Mormon sociologist. “I think there is going to be a wholesale reconsideration with how Mormons should deal with the latent and overt anti-Mormon propaganda. I don’t think the Mormons are ever again going to sorrowfully turn away and close the door and just keep out of the fray.”
–Jackie Calmes and Elizabeth Holmes contributed to this article.
February 9, 2008 at 8:19 am
I must disagree with the assessment of Dr. Mauss. The Church’s traditional response to bigotry has been to largely ignore it, in favor of participating in venues where we can get more even-handed consideration. I see that as an effective and measured response, and expect this practice to continue as a matter of general policy.
When current events bring us into the spotlight, the mainstream press has never given fair treatment to the Church.
What does it matter if a few barking dogs snap at the heels of the weary travelers? Or that predators claim those few who fall by the way? The caravan moves on.
We know that all things work together for good to them that love God… And if God be for us, who can be against us?
February 9, 2008 at 8:55 am
Hi Jim,
I think I do agree with Dr. Mauss. I also agree with you that the Church’s traditional response has been to ignore it; but, I’m not certain that is the best way to combat it. I have long felt there is sufficient anti-Mormon bigotry out there to justify the Mormon equivalent of the ADL. I also think that bringing this to the light of day by commenting on it and decrying it is more effective than ignoring it. Some of these people, like the Hulses who make their living as anti-Mormon crusaders should be highlighted as examples the of modern day bigots they truly are.
February 9, 2008 at 9:06 am
Oh really Guy? You are the one, who is not being truthful about my husband Rocky and me. You know who we are and you know full well, that my husband served 33 years on active duty in the Navy. You know he just retired in 2006 and we live on his earned retirement. You are the one being dishonest and lying, not us.
February 9, 2008 at 9:36 am
Well written and well said….another blog to add to my favorites. tfs
February 9, 2008 at 10:01 am
Helen, Please. When I say you make a living out of lying about and denigrating others religious beliefs, I mean that’s all you and Rocky do, full time 24/7. The fact you aren’t financially successful at it just means people don’t really support your bigoted views.
I might add the front page Wall Street Journal Article you so proudly display on your web page, is not a complimentary article towards you or Rocky. You try and paint it as a badge of honor. But, they are pointing out what I have for some time: You people are religious bigots!
February 9, 2008 at 1:33 pm
Oh really, Guy…aka Orrin Porter Rockwell
Only pure Mormon arrongance, would display himself, as this man.
From Wikipedia:
“Porter Rockwell was that most terrible instrument that can be handled by fanaticism; a powerful physical nature welded to a mind of very narrow perceptions, intense convictions, and changeless tenacity. In his build he was a gladiator; in his humor a Yankee lumberman; in his memory a Bourbon; in his vengeance an Indian. A strange mixture, only to be found on the American continent.”
—Fitz Hugh Ludlow, 1870.
February 9, 2008 at 2:37 pm
Guy…Oops Porter, you did a lot of name calling, below is posted on our website:
____________________________________________
We are mentioned on a front page article (A1) in the February 8, 2008 edition of the Wall Street Journal. The article is titled: Mormons Dismayed by Harsh Spotlight, by Suzanne Sataline.
In the article it talks about the fact that we did a seminar at Life Point Bible Church in Quincy, Illinois. At that seminar we discussed the Mormon doctrine that denies the virgin birth. The article says that Scott Gordon, president of Foundation for Apologetics Information & Research (FAIR), a Mormon apologetics group, said “Mr. Hulse is wrong on the facts.” Well I challenge Scott Gordon to disprove the quotes that were directly taken from my new book “When Salt Lake City Calls.” If Scott Gordon can prove they are wrong or misquoted, I will be happy to remove them from my book and print an apology. If they are not wrong, which they are not, Scott Gordon needs to issue me an apology for wrongly stating that my facts were wrong, because they weren’t.
____________________________________________
Guy…aka Porter, I make the same challenge to you and any other person, who reads the above statement. Bring it on!
February 9, 2008 at 3:38 pm
Mormons are not Creedal Christians. However, they do believe in the Jesus Christ of the New Testament:
The Church of Jesus Christ (LDS) is often accused by Evangelical pastors of not believing in Christ and, therefore, not being a Christian religion. This article http://mormonsarechristian.blogspot.com/ helps to clarify such misconceptions by examining early Christianity’s comprehension of baptism, the Godhead, the deity of Jesus Christ and His Atonement.
The Church of Jesus Christ (LDS) adheres more closely to First Century Christianity and the New Testament than any other denomination. For example, Harper’s Bible Dictionary entry on the Trinity says “the formal doctrine of the Trinity as it was defined by the great church councils of the fourth and fifth centuries is not to be found in the New Testament.”
One Baptist blogger stated “99 percent of the members of his Baptist church believe in the Mormon (and Early Christian) view of the Trinity. It is the preachers who insist on the Nicene Creed definition.” It seems to me the reason the pastors denigrate the Church of Jesus Christ (LDS) is to protect their flock (and their livelihood).
February 9, 2008 at 8:21 pm
Guy, I think Mauss’ characterization is off-base. We have never sorrowfully turned away and closed the door dealing with anti-Mormon bigotry. Rather, we have a well-defined set of priorities. Actively attempting to correct willful ignorance must necessarily occupy a fairly low spot on the list of important tasks. Else it simply constitutes a distraction.
I see it as a sort of triage.
Exchanging comments with those selling pure priestcraft is generally a waste of time. If there is anything to be gained in such settings, it will come through the spirit and witness of true testimony, not through contentious arguments.
At least that is my experience.
February 9, 2008 at 8:51 pm
Jim,
Well, perhaps. I don’t know. I think in times past many have not been as aggressive in speaking out against such bigotry. I do think that is changing more and more, with the rise of folks like FAIR and FARMS, and others. I very much agree with Mauss’ characterization that anti-Mormon bigotry is akin to anti-Semitism, and have felt this way for a long, long time. As I said above, I truly wish we had an equivalent group to the ADL.
I do agree though with your larger point that sometimes actively engaging in a tit for tat debate is not always productive. I also like your characterization of this stuff as priestcraft.
February 9, 2008 at 10:01 pm
Jim,
I also liked the Church’s official response to this article, and other related ones which it recently posted on its website. Quoting the last part:
February 10, 2008 at 9:38 pm
How can the Mormon defenders claim that the church’s history of racial bigotry was instituted by Brigham Young, not Joseph Smith, and thereby absolve themselves? Brigham Young was presumably appointed by God to lead the church after Joseph Smith’s death. This, of course, is the same authority that appointed Joseph Smith to begin with. You can not be divinely inspired in one and not the other. The Mormon church has colossal philosophical problems with its origens and cannonized literature. That is where the debate should be focused if enlightened thinking is the objective here. This scrutiny will not be “faith inspiring” for the true beleivers.
February 15, 2008 at 8:04 pm
where is the straight talking express when it comes to denouncing the bigotry directed at the mormons? is there a polical extermination order that is being proposed against the mormons by the evangelicals? there was a governor from missouri named lilburn boggs who signed an extermination order against the mormons on october 27, 1838. is this what the huckabee forces were suggesting should happen to the mormons in 2008?
February 5, 2020 at 10:47 am
books-top (Mathematics) Free Ebook – books-top (Politics & Social Sciences) Free Ebook, books-top (Cookbooks, Food & Wine) Free Ebook
February 25, 2020 at 3:20 pm
carding forum russian – carding forum 2020, carding forum uk
March 21, 2020 at 12:20 pm
look at here now buy cvv
March 31, 2020 at 5:28 pm
неотразимый сайт http://4xcasino.ru
April 27, 2020 at 6:24 am
world of tanks – Свежие новости игр, wow игра
April 29, 2020 at 5:50 pm
смотреть жанр мюзикл онлайн в хорошем качестве FullHD на hdhc.site – Добро пожаловать, дорогой зритель, на сайт HD Домашний Кинотеатр Онлайн. HD Home Cinema Online предлагает вашему внимаю новинки в 4K UHD, FullHD и HD качестве, база с видео обновляется каждый день. Фильмы, сериалы, аниме, wwe, тв-передачи (прямая трансляц, смотреть индийский сериал онлайн все серии подряд в хорошем качестве FullHD на hdhc.site
May 5, 2020 at 7:51 pm
visit site buy dumps
July 5, 2020 at 3:09 am
химчистка мягкой мебели на дому Житомир – уборку после ремонта Житомир, чистка килимів
July 8, 2020 at 3:19 pm
Купить больничный лист – справка для поступления, справка 302н купить
July 19, 2020 at 6:17 pm
сердечный ресурс https://gamblingpp.ru/
July 27, 2020 at 6:31 pm
official source 3d game
September 7, 2020 at 1:36 pm
Recommended Reading как зайти на гидру
September 12, 2020 at 10:47 pm
справный вебресурс https://1xbets-bk.ru
September 21, 2020 at 5:04 pm
Отмирание клеток головного мозга – Атеросклероз сосудов головного мозга, Глиобластома головного мозга